Topic 396 - Hair Multiplication & Other Advanced Treatments (open forum # 28)

[ Male Forum | Female Forum | Contents | Search | Post | Reply | Next | Previous | Up ]

Re: To James

From: TAFP
Remote Name: 131.216.128.250
Date: 09 May 2001
Time: 18:22:52

Comments

Klik - "cosmetic" for men is one thing, "cosmetic" for women is something entirely different. The reason we don't have a REAL cure yet is because HL is a primarily cosmetic problem, and men - who overwhelmingly suffer from it - are not expected to be greatly concerned with "cosmetic" issues. Therefore, in my estimation putting forth a good case in favor of hair restoration for the benighted few WOMEN who suffer from it, would actually make a DRAMATIC case for us all, and advance our cause like the proverbial silver bullet!

After all, it was Dr. Gho HIMSELF who - in the very interview he gave which was published on May 7 - that HAIR MULTIPLICATION WAS ORIGINALLY CONCEIVED FOR WOMEN!!!

Yes, that's right - FOR WOMEN!

This is undoubtedly because in the minds of people like Gho, women have a more legitimate claim to be concerned about their hair loss. The medical establishment has ALWAYS seen hairloss as something men shouldn't really care about - unless the doctors stand to make a lot of money (like HT surgeons do). Gho himself ADMITTED that HM was originally conceived for WOMEN. Why? Not because women could benefit more from HM. Frankly, the reverse is actually true. Women who have very diffuse, generalized hair loss (so-called hormonal "female pattern baldness") actually have fewer intact donor follicles which can be used for hair multiplication.

But the mindset of Gho and his ilk was to develop it primarily for, or first for, women. WHY???

Think about it!

Last changed: January 11, 2009

© Copyright 1997 - 2000  TSE Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved.
No part of this website can be reproduced. Contact info: HairSite@aol.com